Lex Liberas

Lex Liberas

Constitutional Solutions: Articles III & IV

Republicanism and the Supreme Court

Ethan Savka's avatar
Ethan Savka
Nov 01, 2025
∙ Paid

Welcome back to Lex Liberas, a blog on the Constitution, law, and yes, constitutional law. On Sundays I bring you some relevant headlines and news, and on Fridays (excepting Halloween for good luck), I drop articles like these in your inbox. Make sure to share this blog around. It helps a lot.

Share Lex Liberas

Today I will continue with my series on “constitutional solutions” by breaking down some themes from each individual article of the Constitution that can help solve constitutional problems today. Unlike the prior two, however, I will base the general themes discussed here around a specific example: an article by the Manhattan Institute’s Andy Smarick titled Why SCOTUS Should Uphold a Law I Dislike.

Governing Right
Why SCOTUS Should Uphold a Law I Dislike
This is an unpleasant column to write. I’m going to argue that the US Supreme Court should uphold a Colorado law that I think is misguided. If I get my way and the Court allows this law to stand, what I believe to be a bad policy will continue…
Read more
19 days ago · 3 likes · Andy Smarick

Alright, let’s get into it.


In his post, Smarick argues that the Supreme Court should uphold Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy in the case Chiles v. Salazar. While his conclusion on this particular law is misguided, the principle he bases this argument upon, namely republican

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Lex Liberas to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Ethan
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture